Stupid things like systems not fully powering off or suspending correctly, and not getting the screen size from X11 correctly (this is quite a bizarre problem that makes full screen apps fall of the side of the screen that I've never seen before - and it does not seem to be a virtual desktop problem). This is now long in the tooth, and does not appear to play nicely with the most recent LTS X11 and older Nvidia cards that I have installed in some of my machines. When the whole Unity/Mir thing kicked off, I nearly abandoned Ubuntu, trying Mint, and mainline Debian, and LDME, but decided that I liked where Ubuntu sat in the distribution hierarchy (sufficiently functional to mostly work out of the box, and not so far down the line that it was dependent on too many other distros.), and instead worked to use a desktop other than Unity, eventually settling on Gnome Fall/Failback. I've been an Ubuntu user since Dapper Drake (6.06), which is what I moved to when the old Redhat Desktop releases stopped. I have to admit that I am becoming disillusioned with the whole GNU/Linux distro. Re: But wouldn't someone who wanted Cinnamon choose Mint in the first place? Why make it more stressful than is absolutely necessary? And no, policy based on some dogma of open source is *not* a reason to make an environment more stressful.Īnd unfortunately, the classic OSes used by the masses are monolithic things that marry one desktop environment with one OS and one kernel, and in some cases, are just. ![]() I know this, because I've lived that life for the better part of 5 years and it caused a lot of grief and upset (and some mental health issues in some people) because the work environment is where you spend at least a third of your waking hours in. You might think (and know) your chosen distie is the mostest-bestest-awesomest on the planet, but if your employees/colleagues can't get to grips with it, that's a problem. You can decry my (or pointing this out as irrelevant all you like, but the fact remains that when you have hundreds or thousands of employees who are used to one thing, being made to switch to another thing that while being 'easier' on the budget is less usable in their daily work than the thing they were made to switch from, then you have a problem when those employees start complaining en masse that their work environment is being made more difficult. I point at the case of the Munich administration who decided to go all open source, and then, eventually after several years of faffing of trying to make open source work in their desktop environments, went back to Windows. If Jessie doesn't provide these, switch to a better Linux distro.īut they're not irrelevant to those with the purse strings, the budgets, and the like. You can also install all the additional Qt3 sub-packages: qt3-designer, qt3-devel-docs, qt3-config, plus all the Qt3 ODBC stuff + database connection drivers. : applications using the Qt GUI toolkit: the header files, the Qt ![]() Summary : Development files for the Qt 3 GUI toolkitĭescription : The qt3-devel package contains the files necessary to develop ![]() ![]() Summary : The shared library for the Qt 3 GUI toolkit usr/share/lsb/4.1/submodules/toolkit-qt3-4.1-noarch usr/share/lsb/4.1/submodules/toolkit-qt-4.1-noarch I have Qt 3.5 installed through LSB Desktop on Fedora 33 right now: Linux Standard Base? Not only is Qt not part of that since Jessie, lsb-desktop only provides Qt4.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |